Be fun to have that and play mastering engineer. Then I bought the new SACD version. In the world of high-fidelity audio, two formats have stood the test of time and continue to captivate audiophiles: SACD (Super Audio CD) and vinyl records. . Dec 10, 2005. Normally in making CD/LP comparisons from the same masters the poorer separation necessitated by the physical matrixing of the two channels into a single vinyl groove is hardly noticed, but this time it was extremely apparent. Next. The quantization noise floor for 16-bit digital audio (the CD standard) is -96 dB, each bit yielding 6 dB of headroom between the noise floor and the ceiling. . All titles are mastered from the original analog tapes by Bernie. Im just wondering when? Menu. The Dark Side of the Moon produced two singles: "Money" and "Us and Them. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. It plays PCM and may not do high res. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. . #4. SACD is a very nice addition if you maintain a decent stationary rig anyway. On the Analogue Productions SACD,. . Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. I always remember the SACD being pretty good, but I now think the vinyl destroys it. Audiogon The world's largest high-end audio community. I will do some digging myself, so far still on the fence. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Vinyl has more. No change in data , no change in sound , simple as that. Sent from my LG-H820. " CD or SACD vs Vinyl. I'm generally rather selective about my SACD purchases and onl. Mobile Fidelity Gold CD 1988. I will add this is one album I prefer listening to on CD (the MFSL release) or especially SACD vs vinyl so take my opinion with a grain of salt. Vinyl. I had some old albums I wanted to play, so I blew the dust off my 35 year old TT and fired that mut. New items New comments Author list Series Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews. This is the reason why Pink Floyd did NOT consider Alan Parsons. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. K. 00. I've got a pretty good setup for vinyl and digital audio files, but I have an opportunity to get a "minty" 10-yr old audiophile-grade CD/SACD player for $350. Sign in with Twitter. When Analogue Productions announced it would be releasing Bernie Grundman-mastered versions of the complete Steely Dan catalog on vinyl and SACD, audiophiles rejoiced. It lacks the deep bass of the Abkco pressing but sounds so much more "vivid" and real. Both needed to be set up properly and tracked at their maximum rated vertical tracking force. Submitted by Irwin on Sun, 2015-04-26 01:07 . Compared to the vinyl, more rounded, less real. While the standard CD format is tied to a 44. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. Data read from an SHM CD is no different to the data red from an ordinary CD. But when I find an album that is available in SACD vs Vinyl----SACD 90% of the time, unless the LP is a collectors items and LTD edition. MikeT, Nov 3, 2019. In other words it needs some work to breath. I decided to include CD quality as well – and a couple other comparisons thrown in for good measure. This is the reason why Pink Floyd did NOT consider Alan Parsons. Location: KC Chiefs Kingdom. SACD vs. Get the DCC Gold CD of the Platinum-SHM mastering. Sucks that there's no general concensus as to which CD is better, aside from the SACD. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. SACD vs. Decca’s landmark recording of Wagner’s 15-hour epic, Der Ring des Nibelungen conducted by Sir Georg Solti is the most celebrated classical recording in history. The band did NOT like it at all. • UHQR Vinyl Record. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. The authors aren’t saying that high-res digital might sound a little different from Red Book CD but is no better. They are not cheap but not the most expensive of the DCC discs. The initial presentation changed from relatively mechanical to one with atmosphere and naturalness. Quote: Originally posted by kelly jopi The largest problem I have with these subjective opinions is that rarely are both the SACD player and the turntable system of equal quality. Packaging: Nicest packaging and faithful reproduction of the original album. #20. They actually already did this when comparing SACD vs. Merch Rep the community and hobby you love so much. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. SACD vs. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. label will be coming to hybrid stereo SACD (playable on all CD players) as well as to audiophile-standard UltraDisc One-Step 180-gram, 45 RPM vinyl. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. 1 remixes which I love. It might not bother some people though. is the world leader in audiophile music. That leaves Soft Parade which also was released by Audio Fidelity. I like Analogue Productions' work, so it should be interesting to hear how they sound. Then I bought the new SACD version. Unfortunately, the vinyl and CDs were impressive but not immersive. Also my opinion only. I was still unconvinced. I found pretty cheap options in my local stores with used items: DVD player - Philips DVD-SACD 763SA (has SACD support) SACD player - SONY SCD-XE670. Both sound great but I only want to keep one. High Resolution: SACD offers a significantly higher sample rate and bit depth, resulting in more accurate and. Both formats have their own unique advantages and disadvantages, so it can be tough to decide which one is right for you. I have to say that after a couple of years of critical listening, I like SACD better. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountSACD vs CD-do you listen and compare SACD/CD layers on your discs? Discussion in 'Music Corner' started by BSC, Apr 13, 2015. This gives vinyl a far more limited soundstage compared to its digital counterpart. The thing that I found most interesting when reviewing the first-time LP record pressing of George Harrison’s 1992 live album — called simply Live In Japan — was not the high quality, dark black, perfectly. This music does not sound shrill in the concert hall, and it doesn’t here. #13. The other thing to keep in mind is that SACD is a format in its infancy. . It is a high end format accessible to someone who doesn't want to mess with a protractor, cleaning records or flipping a disc every 20 minutes. Headquartered in Salina, Kansas, Acoustic Sounds, Inc. If you like those genres then I can support jumping into SACD's in 2022. There are also the hybrid SACD discs from AP but I am not as familiar with those. I've noticed a surfeit in the cost and availability of SACD's - prices are really cheap for some top notch music, often recorded in Europe with the cost for many disks below $12- with shipping no less! I'm in the process of digitizing my vinyl along with ripping hundreds of CD's to my Mac, but I also like playing a. (Warner 3010-2, mastering credit: Perry, Caillat) for 9. #2. Boy, what a difference. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. The 2003 hybrid SACD and the MFSL feature the original mix, but they have inferior sound to the JWH tracks which appear on. The first was, that the vinyl was on the same transparency level but more organic sounding, the second was, that the SACD was clearly more transparent sounding, which overruled other differences. As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. Like the DVD, SACD was a dual-layer format, but instead of one or two high-density layers, the SACD could have a high-density layer and a CD-compatible layer, so the. The remastering has added the humanity and warmth Mozart requires. CD. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. It's very difficult to set up a direct A/B comparison between SACD and CD. I have to say that 3 songs into the SACD I shut it off and went back to the vinyl. Boy, what a difference. The fact that the DSD pulse train VISUALLY happens to look more like the analog signal than the string of binary numbers that result from PCM encoding is meaningless - since both must be converted to analog audio anyway. In fact, it's a good sign that the music isn't overly compressed. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. SACD has a higher bit rate and uses a different encoding method from Vinyl to capture and reproduce more audio information. 49:Personally I am fine with well mastered hi res digital. Location: West Hollywood, CA and Inverness, IL. Since this is just for SACD vs SACD I'll start a thread on my preferred mastering for jazz and classical for all digital formats. Location: Panama. SACD obviously has an advantage on portability and probably overall SQ - but that's still subjective as I might enjoy the "colorization" of vinyl more. At current SACD and vinyl reissue prices I sure do. Two channel SACD just blew away the CD's, while hybrids were not out yet I had albums that I had both the CD and the SACD to compare. The difference becomes clearer and clearer the more I listen. That depends on what you are looking for. Shawn, Dec 8, 2012. There's no real difference between the sound characteristics of vinyl, SACD or CD. Once you listen to the unbelievable sound of the grandfather clock chiming you. 98. . In the vinyl vs. e. The band's incendiary…I agree to a point, but "everything matters" and adding an well built, linear power supply to my source made a subtle but very, very noticeable improvement as did cableing, power cables, isolation, etc. I have two completely different setups for vinyl, and digital, and my vinyl is always a little more bass and drums heavy, past that, no glaring differences. . This release was originally announced in late 2019 and fans have been waiting patiently ever since. New items New comments Author list Series Latest content Latest updates Latest reviews. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Rolling Stone ranked them No. Boy, what a difference. But, Keith's drumming track seems lack lustre and 'dull', imo. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". Sorry about my bad English. The better sounding recordings any given record company are the one's chosen for SACD release. Even vinyl has enough dynamic range to cover that. One is the MFSL version which I loved. Bluntness acknowledged as you being quite passionate, or convinced that the 20th anniversary SACD version is poor at best It was actually the first SACD I bought many years ago, even without owning an SACD capable player at the time. General observations: * The Who - SHM-SACD is quite clean - I can easily move in and out of each track within each song so there is vg clarity. From the sound’s point of view, there is always a difference between SACD and the regular cd, but that left apart, usually XRCDs are sounding much better than. 49. . We specialize in vinyl records and turntables. The world's largest online retailer of high-end audio, audiophile music, and accessories. Head Gear. Search first posts only. One more thing. On a CD, the separation between the left and right channels used in recording is over 90 dB. The Royal Scam features more prominent guitar work than the prior Steely Dan album, Katy Lied, which had been the first without founding guitarist Jeff Baxter. I much prefer CD to SACD. Details;SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. 45 RPM 200 Gram Clarity Vinyl. Bonus enjoyment if you have a 5. Oh yeah, Aimee Mann and Vanessa Fernandez too, that would be the newest. Elton John Elton John (2004 Rocket SACD HR B0003607-36) All the Elton John SACD's sound incredible. I would think that the Vinyl will sound better than the standard CD. These have to be the quietest set of CDs to be mastered in the “modern era”. All we need here is a study showing listeners preferred the 24/192 version of an album over its 16/44 counterpart in a rigorous study. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. I've heard many great sounding redbook cd's and I've heard some horrible vinyl. Los Angeles, CA. It's not exactly chopped liver sonically as I recall, but I will likely go for the MFSL SACD as well, if only to get a nice redbook to boot. I only have a single SHM-SACD - it’s superior compared to every format I’ve heard the title on, including the MoFI SACD. . This one is the best sounding by far. I’ll explain in a minute, but first I want to make sure we know what the SACD format is, and what makes it different from a standard compact disc. Hi all, Im searching for some way to test SACD compared to vinyl. Hybrid Stereo SACD. Posted August 3, 2011. of the Dark Side of the Moon, is NOT good sonically. Tony Plachy, Jan 7, 2015. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. Add to Cart. Along with LPs, SACDs, reel-to-reel tape and other forms of high-quality audio. Today, the world has moved on to multi-bit PCM. Then I bought the new SACD version. The vinyl was much better. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. Search Head Gear. It lacks the deep bass of the Abkco pressing but sounds so much more "vivid" and real. Description. But they always compares SACD vs CD on the same player. I compared the 2003 SACD and the Mofi: the noise is certainly clearer on the Mofi, but it's present on the 2003. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. SACD (white) vs Bluray (blue) The pressing quality of 2022 vinyl is not always perfect, but often a wash will solve the problem. SACD debate, there is no definitive answer to which format offers the ultimate listening experience. Vinyl- whoa. The string attack, decay, soundstage, and imaging are way ahead of the SACD. I listened to them a few times each over a period of a year. gloomrider, Feb 20, 2014 #177. I can't believe there's any real debate over MFSL SACD vs. for making the SACD version, and instead they CHOSE James Guthrie, who was an engineer producing, e. Limited Edition Numbered SACD CMOB 2260 SA $29. Just for kicks I decided to compare Side A of the Speakers Corner vinyl to the same corresponding songs on the JSACD. The overall DR between the 2 is very close. DACs sound different because different DACs apply different filters to the input data and have different methods of producing the analogue signal, even if every DAC used the same chip each DAC's analogue output stage is different. Whilst many (recent) multichannel SACDs are more about ambience, others are about using the system to provide an immersive sound (e. Hendersonville, Tennessee Home of Cash & Orbison. Thread: SACD Vs. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. Vinyl vs SACD. DSD is also far more accurate where it counts, in the meaty. I think SACD has the best audio fidelity of any medium I have ever heard to date. November 4th for CBAT. Then I bought the new SACD version. Low Noise Floor: SACDs tend to have a lower noise floor compared to vinyl records, which means less background noise or surface noise during playback. It also provides a higher bit rate and longer. 2. SHM-SACD vs UK Vinyl. SACD VS Vinyl for Jazz and Classical Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. . Show Printable Version; 12-12-2012, 03:54 AM #31. Inner ear, May 11, 2017 #5. Standard CDs still constitute over 94% of the market, cassettes about 5%, and vinyl LPs easily outselling both new high resolution format discs during the first half of this year 661,000 sold versus only 92,000!. When it comes to listening to music, there are two main formats that audiophiles swear by: SACD players and vinyl. I go between the US Sony SACD and the 35DP depending on mood. I no longer have the capability of playing vinyl. The best of both worlds is vinyl ripped on a very high end rig in High res and then converted to DSD. Nevertheless, the advantages are obviously. Madman Across the Water SACD vs CD vs LP. Gooey black bag houses an extremely high quality record sleeve with postcards, posters, 320 kbps MP3 download and sturdy inner sleeve and a very nice vinyl record in a plastic sleeve. Vinyl. 00. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. One is the MFSL version which I loved. OTOH, there are many recordings from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that are of poor sound quality. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. But CDs are fine. A lot of pops and crackles ("a lot" for a brand new MFSL vinyl, I mean) on the. 1 setup. 112 posts total. It may still engage me more, even if the SQ overall is not as pristine as an SACD. I wrote I was somewhat pleased with the mastering. Voted Vinyl. Very pleasing, I like it. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Quick links. I own the Nautalus half-speed master from the 70's and owned the SACD. In other forum in Madrid we have carried out the test with the Stereophile material and I'm anxious to know if yo have done the same overhere and what results you have obtained. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. By meatballz August 2, 2011 in General Hi-Fi Discussion. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". ”. Vinyl: SACD offers digital precision, while vinyl provides analog warmth and character. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. 1% $750-$1,000 15 vote(s) 8. it's stickly limited to 7500 copies. vinyl superior to both? thats been conjectured. Same thing goes for SACD. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. I've not jumped on the SACD bandwagon. Denon - DCD-A110 SACD/CD Player. For vinyl releases, I have this pressing, a MFSL pressing and a late 70's/early 80's US pressing (which is now pretty worn) and I prefer the MFSL version. The SHM concept is nonsense , its no different to those magic markers that you were supposed to color the edges of your CD's with. . Recent MoFi controversy spurred me to compare sound of MoFi Vinyl to CD, SACD to CD, DSD to FLAC. Acoustic Sounds Audiophile Vinyl Records. Actually, probably the biggest difference that I have seen with the SACD format. Should I buy the Deluxe edition for my Blu ray player that plays SACD or buy the Vinyl for an actual Vinyl player I would have to buy. I listen mainly to vinyl via a Marantz TT15 Benz Wood SH MC combo. Kevin Gray's work is superior, no matter the format. Endymion, Apr 22, 2015. . disc duplication: The Indie Music Minute. 1kHz/16-bit digital audio is indistinguishable from high-resolution digital. SACD (1999) uses completely different 1-Bit method of encoding so it is hard to extrapolate, but best guess, SACD is about. Vinyl. shadorne. The question of whether SACD sounds better is subjective and nuanced. As noted in my previous post [link], the Forum didn’t want to pay the $. The dynamics of the attack are still there, but the leading edge lacks aggressiveness and sounds much smoother. I have most of the recordings you mention and they're all great. This is the average EQ of the first track, Tears of Rage. Analog Format. I do have two different versions of "Question of Balance". The versions are dynamic with a DR12 and from master in DSD except for the vinyl which is pure analog. (1993 Sony Japan SRCS-6827) Pearl Jam-Yield (1998 Epic Vinyl E 68164) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (1983 Toshiba Japan Black Triangle De Emph CP35-3017) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (1993 EMI 20th Anniv 0777 7 81479 2 3) Pink Floyd-The Dark Side Of The Moon (2003 EMI SACD HR 7243 582136 2 1) Pink Floyd-The Wall (D1) (2006 EMI. One example is excess Volume Compression in modern music. I think the Doug Sax mastering has a slight edge over the other two and the funny thing is. So I did. . g. A vinyl record vs a SACD is very very close. The higher the bitrate, the better the sound quality. There are records for every genre of music I listen to, whereas almost nothing I listen to is ever released on SACD. I voted 'Who Cares. The overall mastering job is superior on the Abkco releases and the detail is greater on both the SACD and vinyl reissuses. I may have to compare the SHM-SACD or other CD versions to this SACD to see if it improves at all on those. Even better than the regular SACD with even clearer presentation. SACD tend to be level adjusted a bit higher than other formats,so will sound more impressive on a A/B comparison. 1 kHz sampling rate, SACD samples at 2. It is probably a more accurate rendition of the master tape but with my turntable and on. #6. In-Stock Music Orders Over $99 SHIP FREE Within The Continental U. It's a euphonic medium to me, at the end of the day. vinyl, I don't have vinyl so can't really tell. A digital recording doesn't degrade overtime like a record does when played too many times. 1. Roland. Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. It's great for archiving, in it's day. Mastered: Doug Sax, James Guthrie, Joel Plante. My DCC is definitly better. meatballz. Most are remasters of jazz, blues, classical or classic rock/pop titles. Would someone out there who has the vinyl and has compared it to either the MFSL CD or the newer SACD please. They are not cheap but not the most expensive of the DCC discs. Please login or register an accountlogin or register an accountI purchased the Immersion box when it was released for the surround mix. For vinyl I currently have the 2009 Classic 200g, I think mastered by Grundman. Boy, what a difference. . IMHO. Get either the target Morrison Hotel CD or the Audio Fidelity. . Although the MFSL version is very clear and precise, the SACD version is more expansive and full. The real difference. DANKOSKY: We'll be talking a bit about some of these new, modern ways of compressing music. At all. CDs are a digital music storage medium, meaning the music is encoded as binary data. Hard to say which sounds better, but they both sound very hard to top. 1k Posted October 24, 2003 The XRCD probably had a goosed up high end and somebody was fooled into preferring it. 1 layer is very good, but the SACD layer has smoother high frequencies (violins, oboe) and better transient attack (tympani). Vinyl is better than CD because it reproduces higher frequencies than CD and avoids anti-aliasing filter issues at the frequencies CDs can reproduce. By all means, get the 4 DCC's. You're comparing a fully mature fomat (vinyl) with what, 80 years of development behind it, to one with 4 years or so. An independent musician needs to make CDs Disc replication vs. SACD vs. What you're saying about DACs, i. SACD vs. Technically, it's more an aesthetic choice or trying to be louder than the other band on the street. I've a Sony XA7ES cd player that has served me well over the years, but even it doesn't get enough play to. Well, I've been thinking of getting into vinyl for a while now but still haven't done it. According to a theorem called. Which format do you like the most, or find to be the closest to the original master tapes? Or, if you attend live concerts (or play and instrument), which format do you prefer and why? wenterprisesnw 02-04-2000 7:53pm. vinyl. Consequently, the Super Audio CD (SACD) was developed by Philips and Sony. When I got my better audio system I bought a dedicated two channel Sony SCD-1 player. Both vinyl records and Super Audio CDs have. The Beethoven symphony cycle on LSO Live (Haitink, 2006) is an SACD hybrid set. e.